A third dose of the BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine sufficiently improves the neutralizing activity against SARS-CoV-2 variants in liver transplant recipients.

Introduction: We examined the neutralizing antibody production efficiency of the second and third severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccine doses (2nd- and 3rd-dose) and neutralizing activity on mutant strains, including, the Ancestral, Beta and Omicron strains using green fluorescent protein-carrying recombinant SARS-CoV-2, in living-donor liver transplantation (LDLT) recipients. Methods: The patients who were administered vaccines other than Pfizer- BioNTechBNT162b2 and who had coronavirus disease 2019 in this study period were excluded. We enrolled 154 LDLT recipients and 50 healthy controls. Result: The median time were 21 days (between 1st and 2nd vaccination) and 244 days (between 2nd and 3rd vaccination). The median neutralizing antibody titer after 2nd-dose was lower in LDLT recipients than in controls (0.46 vs 1.00, P<0.0001). All controls had SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibodies, whereas 39 LDLT recipients (25.3%) had no neutralizing antibodies after 2nd-dose; age at vaccination, presence of ascites, multiple immunosuppressive treatments, and mycophenolate mofetil treatment were significant risk factors for nonresponder. The neutralizing activities of recipient sera were approximately 3-fold and 5-fold lower than those of control sera against the Ancestral and Beta strains, respectively. The median antibody titer after 3rd-dose was not significantly different between recipients and controls (1.02 vs 1.22, p=0.0758); only 5% recipients was non-responder. The neutralizing activity after third dose to Omicron strains were enhanced and had no significant difference between two groups. Conclusion: Only the 2nd-dose was not sufficiently effective in recipients; however, 3rd-dose had sufficient neutralizing activity against the mutant strain and was as effective as that in healthy controls.

Effect of COVID-19 on hepatitis B and C virus countermeasures: Hepatologist responses from nationwide survey in Japan.

AIM: Achieving hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) elimination requires continuous and sustained high volumes of diagnosis and treatment, which have been affected by the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic. This study assessed the effects of COVID-19 on hepatitis-related services in Japan and compared Japan's situation with a global survey. METHODS: We conducted an online cross-sectional questionnaire survey of hepatologists from the Japan Society of Hepatology from August to October 2021 by using the same questionnaire from which a survey was conducted globally to address the effects of COVID-19 on hepatitis-related services. Hepatologists responded based on own impressions of their affiliated institutions. RESULTS: In total, 196 hepatologists participated from 35 prefectures including 49.5% in managerial positions. Approximately 40% survey participants reported a 1%-25% decline in HBV and HCV screening and confirmatory testing. In addition, 53.6% and 45.4% reported no decline in HBV and HCV treatment initiation, respectively. Comparing any level of decrease with the global survey, there was less of a decline observed in Japan for screening (HBV: 51% vs. 56.3%, HCV: 51% vs. 70.9%) and treatment initiation (HBV: 32.7% vs. 52.4%, HCV: 41.8% vs. 66%). However, patient anxiety/fear (67.4%) and loss of staff due to COVID-19 (49.0%) were reported as challenges for resuming services to pre-COVID-19 levels. CONCLUSION: Although in Japan all-inclusive decline in HBV- and HCV-related services were lower than in other countries, a greater decline was observed in HBV and HCV screening and diagnosis than in treatment initiation. Prolonged anxiety/fear among patients, and loss of staff and facilities from the COVID-19 response activities must be addressed to achieve elimination of hepatitis by 2030.

Serum CCL17 level becomes a predictive marker to distinguish between mild/moderate and severe/critical disease in patients with COVID-19.

COVID-19, a novel coronavirus-related illness, has spread worldwide. Patients with apparently mild/moderate symptoms can suddenly develop severe pneumonia. Therefore, almost all COVID-19 patients require hospitalization, which can reduce limited medical resources in addition to overwhelming medical facilities. To identify predictive markers for the development of severe pneumonia, a comprehensive analysis of serum chemokines and cytokines was conducted using serial serum samples from COVID-19 patients. The expression profiles were analyzed along the time axis. Serum samples of common diseases were enrolled from a BioBank to confirm the usefulness of predictive markers. Five factors, IFN-λ3, IL-6, IP-10, CXCL9, and CCL17, were identified as predicting the onset of severe/critical symptoms. The factors were classified into two categories. Category A included IFN-λ3, IL-6, IP-10, and CXCL9, and their values surged and decreased rapidly before the onset of severe pneumonia. Category B included CCL17, which provided complete separation between the mild/moderate and the severe/critical groups at an early phase of SARS-CoV-2 infection. The five markers provided a high predictive value (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC): 0.9-1.0, p < 0.001). Low expression of CCL17 was specifically observed in pre-severe COVID-19 patients compared with other common diseases, and the predictive ability of CCL17 was confirmed in validation samples of COVID-19. The factors identified could be promising prognostic markers to distinguish between mild/moderate and severe/critical patients, enabling triage at an early phase of infection, thus avoiding overwhelming medical facilities.